Statements made by Rep. Anna Luna regarding the JFK assassination are a testament to the power of truth to ultimately surface, even within a vast sea of official lies and false official narratives.
Luna is the head of a new congressional task force charged with exposing “federal secrets.” Among those secrets are those that the U.S. national-security establishment has been fiercely guarding ever since the assassination.
As longtime supporters of FFF know, I have long contended that the autopsy that the military conducted on President Kennedy’s body on the very evening of the assassination establishes beyond a reasonable doubt that the assassination was a highly sophisticated regime-change operation orchestrated and carried out by the U.S. national-security establishment — specifically, the Pentagon and the CIA.
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna
How does that autopsy establish criminal culpability on the part of the military? As I detail in my book The Kennedy Autopsy, it was a fraudulent autopsy. There is no innocent explanation for a fraudulent autopsy. A fraudulent autopsy necessarily equates to a cover-up. The only entity for which the military would be covering up on the same day of the assassination would be itself. That’s how we know beyond a shadow of a doubt that the U.S. national-security establishment orchestrated and carried out the assassination.
When we focus on the autopsy, we are not dealing with conspiracy theories. We are simply dealing with the facts surrounding the autopsy. Once one concludes that the autopsy was fraudulent, that’s it — case closed. There is but one conclusion that can be drawn from a fraudulent autopsy — a finding of guilt on the part of the U.S. national-security establishment.
Needless to say, I wasn’t the first person who pointed to a fraudulent autopsy in the Kennedy assassination. In fact, The Kennedy Autopsy is an easy-to-read synopsis of Douglas Horne’s masterful book Inside the Assassination Records Review Board, a five-volume book that establishes the details surrounding the fraud in the autopsy. Horne served on the staff of the ARRB in the 1990s.
Horne is not the only one who has talked and written about anomalies in the autopsy over the years. So have many other reputable and credible assassination researchers, including physicians. David Mantik, Gary Aguilar, and Cyril Wecht come to mind. There are many more.
How does this relate to Luna? In her statements regarding the Kennedy assassination, she makes reference to the Kennedy autopsy. For example, she stated, “I think that even the FBI at the time reported some anomalies in the initial autopsy at Bethesda, Maryland.” An article at the website of Florida international University states, “But Luna said many didn’t ask eyewitnesses enough, including some in the room for the President’s autopsy.”
Luna might be referring to FBI agents James Sibert and Francis O’Neil, whose actions at the autopsy are detailed in The Kennedy Autopsy. Afterward, they prepared a written report that came to be known as the Sibert-O’Neil Report.
That report contained statements that were inconsistent with what became the official narrative of the assassination. Therefore, it’s not surprising that Sibert and O’Neil were not summoned to testify before the Warren Commission. Moreover, their report was classified so that no one could read it. It remained secret until the 1990s, when the ARRB released it to the public and took the oral depositions of both Sibert and O’Neil.
For example, an article on the Spartacus Education website points out this statement in the Sibert-O’Neil Report: “During the later stages of this autopsy, Dr. Humes located an opening which appeared to be a bullet hole which was below his shoulders and two inches to the right of the middle line of the spinal column.”
Why is that a problem that required hiding? Because it’s inconsistent with the trajectory of the so-called magic bullet, which supposedly entered the back of JFK’s neck, exiting downward to hit Gov. Connally and breaking rib bones and wrist bones before lodging in his thigh in a perfect, pristine, never-been-fired condition.
Another example: As I detail in my most recent book on the Kennedy assassination, An Encounter with Evil: The Abraham Zapruder Story, when the ARRB showed Sibert and O’Neil the official autopsy photos depicting the back of Kennedy’s head to be intact, they responded as follows;
Sibert: “Well, I don’t have a recollection of it being that intact…. I don’t remember seeing anything like this.”
O’Neil: “This looks like it’s been doctored in some way…. Quite frankly, I thought there was a larger opening in the back … opening in the back of the head.”
As I detail in both my books, the Dallas treating physicians and even some of the Bethesda autopsy witnesses, as well as Navy Petty Officer Saundra Spencer, who developed the genuine autopsy photos on the weekend of the assassination, established that Kennedy actually had a large exit-sized wound in the back of his head. Needless to say, all that evidence, and more, established that the autopsy photographs were fraudulent and also that the Zapruder film showing the back of Kennedy’s head to be intact was fraudulent as well.
As I show in The Kennedy Autopsy, Sibert and O’Neil also filled in the circumstances surrounding the early, secret introduction of the president’s body into the Bethesda morgue. After the body was secretly carried into the morgue at 6:35 p.m., SIbert and O’Neil unwittingly helped Secret Service agents Roy Kellerman and William Greer to carry the empty Dallas casket into the morgue at 7:17 p.m. so that JFK’s body could be re-inserted into it. That then enabled the Joint Service Casket Team to carry the Dallas casket, with the president’s body in it, into the morgue at the official entry time of 8 p.m.
What was done to JKF’s body when it was secretly in the morgue from 6:35 p.m. to 8 p.m.? In their report that was classified and hidden from the public until the ARRB term in the 1990s, Sibert and O’Neil wrote, “Following the removal of the wrapping, it was ascertained that the President’s clothing had been removed and it was also apparent that a tracheotomy had been performed, as well as surgery of the head area, namely, in the top of the skull. (Italics added.)
There was no surgery of the head area performed in Dallas. Therefore, it had to be surgery performed at Bethesda. Since there was no surgery performed during the autopsy, that leaves but one conclusion: It was secretly performed sometime between 6:35 p.m. and 8 p.m.
I am confident that Rep. Luna does not know all of these facts and details. But what matters that there have been people who, over the years and decades, have never ceased talking and writing about the fraudulent autopsy. Over time, that truth has slowly but surely surfaced in people’s consciousness, at the very least in a general way, as reflected by the statements of Rep. Luna. It is a testament to the power of truth and perseverance to overcome lies and false official narratives.
